Last week, the seaside town of Hastings was branded ‘the Grinch capital of the UK’, after it was revealed that the town had fewer Christmas-related online searches per 100,000 people than anywhere else in the country.
This dubious honour came courtesy of a Singapore-based SEO company, via the kind of press release that always does the rounds at this time of year and generally gets given column inches as local journalists rush to fill the Christmas editions of their papers. I speak as a former local journo who once ran a story when a town in my patch was declared the ‘least kinky’ based on… something or other.
- Tower block tenants trapped in ‘living nightmare’ by bed bug infestations: ‘I’m riddled with them’
- ‘It blew my mind’: Family evicted from temporary housing after having grandparents over for a brew
When Luton was crowned the UK’s ‘least Christmassy town’ last year, the locals came out fighting, with Luton Today giving them a platform to object to the story, which was carried in a diverse range of national publications from Time Out to the Daily Express to LadBible.
But while being the ‘least Christmassy’ town is one thing, being labeled a ‘Grinch’ town gives the whole thing an altogether meaner, nastier tone.
In the original Dr Suess book, the Grinch is a hateful, vengeful creature that sets out to destroy Christmas for the joyful Whos of Whoville for the sheer hell of it. To imply that those living in Hastings are not frantically searching for expensive Christmas gifts or overpriced festive days out because they just want to burn Christmas to the ground is grossly unfair. In fact, it is plain poverty shaming.
Let’s break down why the good people of Hastings may not be feeling the Christmas spirit this year.