Advertising helps fund Big Issue’s mission to end poverty
Housing

A letting fees ban loophole could be abused by rogue landlords

The proposed legislation moved past its second reading in the House of Commons yesterday, but Citizens Advice is calling for a clause on default fees to be significantly tightened

The Tenants Fees Bill has continued its smooth progress through the House of Commons, with its second reading going off without a hitch this week.

MPs debated the proposed legislation, which aims to ban landlords from charging unfair fees in the private rental market, for three hours before passing it unanimously and sending it on to the committee stage.

New Housing Secretary James Brokenshire introduced the bill and heralded it as the “latest step in our work to create a housing market that is fit for the future”.

But independent advice charity Citizens Advice has called on the government to close a loophole that could see renters left vulnerable to “default fees”. A number of MPs echoed their pleas in last night’s debate.

The clause has been included in the bill to allow landlords to charge for tenancy breaches, late rent or to replace lost keys but there are currently no restrictions limiting the fee with the government promising to issue guidance on reasonable amounts.

Advertising helps fund Big Issue’s mission to end poverty
Advertising helps fund Big Issue’s mission to end poverty

But, as this would not be legally enforceable, Citizens Advice is calling on lawmakers to prevent landlords using default fees to pass on unnecessary and unfair costs to tenants. And the charity insists that the clampdown will benefit landlords too – providing a clearer steer on the rules to stop rogue property owners and agents from gaining an advantage.

Gillian Guy, Citizens Advice chief executive, said: “The government’s pledge to ban fees will be fundamentally undermined unless the clause on default fees is significantly tightened.

“The loophole leaves tenants vulnerable to rogue landlords and agents looking to continue charging unfair fees.”

A further amendment to the bill to cap security deposits at four weeks instead of six weeks is also being called for – by Citizens Advice and Caroline Lucas.

During last night’s debate, the Green Party co-leader asked Brokenshire: “Can [you] explain why he has gone for a figure that means that only about 8 per cent of renters will benefit and that many others will see their rents go up as a result?”

The Housing Secretary insisted that the rate was an “upper limit” and offered landlords the “flexibility to accept higher-risk tenants”.

Advertising helps fund Big Issue’s mission to end poverty

READER-SUPPORTED SINCE 1991

Reader-supported journalism that doesn’t just report problems, it helps solve them.

Recommended for you

View all
Housing First promised to be a silver bullet to solve homelessness. Why are we still waiting?  
Housing First

Housing First promised to be a silver bullet to solve homelessness. Why are we still waiting?  

Should stamp duty be scrapped?
Kemi Badenoch
Stamp duty

Should stamp duty be scrapped?

Yo-yo Homes 'indefensible' and highlight broken system, MPs say after Big Issue's Right to Buy exposé
housing secretary Steve Reed with a red line over his face next to a block of flats
Right to Buy

Yo-yo Homes 'indefensible' and highlight broken system, MPs say after Big Issue's Right to Buy exposé

Number of homeless children in England hits yet another record high: 'When will this end?'
the shadow of a young girl
Homelessness

Number of homeless children in England hits yet another record high: 'When will this end?'

Reader-supported journalism that doesn’t just report problems, it helps solve them.

Every day, Big Issue digs deeper – speaking up for those society overlooks. Will you help us keep doing this work?