“We are taking strong and clear steps to boost our border security and ensure the rules are respected and enforced,” Cooper said.
“By increasing enforcement capabilities and returns, we will establish a system that is better controlled and managed, in place of the chaos that has blighted the system for far too long.”
As he ran for prime minister, Keir Starmer promised an end to the use of hotels to accommodate asylum seekers, to hire 1,000 staff for a new “returns and enforcement unit”, and to introduce a new Border Security Command. Labour would “smash the gangs”, Starmer said in an often-used slogan.
Wednesday’s (21 August) announcement from Cooper signals how Labour intends to achieve that in government.
What do the experts make of Labour’s new asylum policies?
But experts are not convinced it will make a positive difference. Several told Big Issue the policies – and tone – represent a strengthening of the “hostile environment” and a return to the Conservative policies slammed by Labour as failures.
“Labour are choosing to ramp up hostile immigration policies and a ‘security’-driven approach. This is nothing new – in fact, it’s the same approach that’s led to people dying at our borders, treated inhumanely in prison-like detention centres and denied their rights,” said Mary Atkinson, campaigns and networks manager at the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants.
“These tired old policies harm everyone in our communities. When migrants are denied the right to work, they are forced into abusive situations. empowering exploitative bosses and pitting workers against each other. When migrants are denied safe routes, they are forced to risk their lives taking dangerous journeys to reach our shores. The far right violence we saw sweep the country just weeks ago should have been an urgent wake up call.”
Labour’s new Border Security Force will be funded by the money saved from scrapping the Rwanda scheme. But Zoe Gardner, an independent migration policy expert, said Labour appeared to be looking for a Rwanda-style gimmick of its own.
“Funnelling more money into detention and deportation is brutal and simply targets the victims instead of addressing the system failures that create irregular migration,” said Gardner.
“In the wake of a wave of racist violence on our streets it is highly irresponsible to be continuing the failed narrative that we can or should simply get rid of immigrants we don’t want. This is a betrayal of the change we were promised at the election.”
In fact, rhetoric of “border security” and “smashing gangs” could embolden smuggling gangs, warned Steve Valdez-Symonds, refugee and migrant rights programme director at Amnesty International UK.
“A new set of ministers promoting an age-old message of fear and hostility regarding some of the most victimised and traumatised people who may ever arrive in the UK, means that smuggling gangs and racist and Islamophobic hate-mongers at home are likely to feed off this to everyone’s detriment,” said Valdez-Symonds.
The expansion of immigration detention sparked alarm for Natasha Tsangarides, associate director of advocacy at Freedom from Torture.
“We know from the survivors of torture we support that blunt enforcement policies and detention only ever cause devastating harm,” said Tsangarides.
Do you have a story to tell or opinions to share about this? Get in touch and tell us more. Big Issue exists to give homeless and marginalised people the opportunity to earn an income. To support our work buy a copy of the magazine or get the app from the App Store or Google Play.
