Advertisement
Opinion

We won’t keep 1.5 alive unless we make room for everyone at the table

Without better representation from women and the Global South, climate negotiations are hugely skewed towards certain interests, writes Anna Johnston from the Women’s Budget Group

COP26 is over, the intense spotlight on the climate emergency is dimming and we are still far behind the degree of commitment and action so urgently needed. As one of the wealthiest nations in the world, the UK has a huge and pressing responsibility to take radical action to limit temperature warming to 1.5 degrees. Yet, this is unlikely to happen if those most impacted are not represented in decision-making.

As we’ve seen with the Covid-19 pandemic, without the interests of those most negatively impacted being given a voice, large moments of national and global change are open to exploitation and capture by big business and private interests.

The eventual COP26 agreements saw oil and gas given little mention, and commitment to phase out coal being watered down at the last minute. This is no surprise given that the largest overall delegation was the Fossil Fuel industry itself,  with 503 delegates connected to the industry. Clearly, money and power buy you a voice. Add this to the already widely derided ‘family photo’ in which just a handful of world leaders were women, and the woeful lack of representation from the Global South we are left with a decision-making body hugely skewed towards certain interests.

Subscribe to The Big Issue

From just £3 per week

Take a print or digital subscription to The Big Issue and provide a critical lifeline to our work. With each subscription we invest every penny back into supporting the network of sellers across the UK. A subscription also means you'll never miss the weekly editions of an award-winning publication, with each issue featuring the leading voices on life, culture, politics and social activism.

Representation and participation matter. Decision-makers often end up approving policies that meet the needs of people like them, often to the exclusion of meeting the needs of others. The lack of diverse representation at COP26 is part of a systemic problem of what and who is seen as valuable within the global economy and what isn’t.

Yet there are reasons for optimism. Despite the COP proceedings proving insufficient, there were many far more ambitious solutions being discussed elsewhere. The Green Zone was open to the public as well as local and grassroots groups, activists and organisers, providing fertile ground for sharing reasoned and practical pathways to inclusive and socially just system change. Fringe events raised the voices of minoritised women and migrants in the UK and women from the Global South, and the epic – if drizzly – march on the Global Day of Action highlighted the commitment of people around the UK and the world to hold leaders accountable. There is energy, enthusiasm and crucially- solutions at all levels to implement social and feminist climate justice, but it will take better representation of those most impacted at the decision-making level if we are going to shift the government towards meaningful, inclusive action.

This is also the case for the UK’s net-zero strategy. We must rapidly decarbonise and reorient the economy towards low-carbon industries. Yet without explicitly addressing and mitigating against current inequalities, a decarbonised UK society will be just as unequal and unjust as it currently is; with unequal access to housing, childcare, transport, jobs, education and ultimately a good quality of life. The business-oriented, financial and tech-heavy solutions being bandied around by Boris Johnson and others will solve some problems but seen as the sole solutions will not help those most in need.

Advertisement
Advertisement

A lack of diverse representation in the UK’s climate policy planning means that little attention is paid to the impact of climate change on women and marginalised groups, particularly those already experiencing intersecting inequalities, or to female-dominated sectors like care that are already low-carbon.

There is also huge public support for making the care sectors a central part of UK net-zero strategies. Almost two-thirds (65 per cent) of the public support the creation of low-carbon jobs through investment in social infrastructure, such as childcare and social care according to polling by the Women’s Budget Group and NEON. Yet this has been so far neglected by the government. 

Government investment in social infrastructure would provide care jobs that offer good training, working conditions and pay. This would mean care work would finally be treated as a valued profession, and a suitable career choice for people who are currently in high-carbon jobs, encouraging them to retrain and move into this sector.

If women were represented and heard in climate decision-making, we might have an opportunity to tackle the care and climate crises in tandem. Whether deflated or energised following COP26, there is much work to be done and the time for action is now.

Anna Johnston is a research and policy officer at the Women’s Budget Group

Advertisement

Bigger Issues need bigger solutions

Big Issue Group is creating new solutions through enterprise to unlock opportunities for the 14.5 million people living in poverty to earn, learn and thrive. Big Issue Group brings together our media and investment initiatives as well as a diverse and pioneering range of new solutions, all of which aim to dismantle poverty by creating opportunity. Learn how you can change lives today.

Recommended for you

Read All
The loss of humanities courses like English literature will leave education in a poorer place
Paul McNamee

The loss of humanities courses like English literature will leave education in a poorer place

'We need to bust the myths that too often exist around children who wait longest to be adopted'
Opinion

'We need to bust the myths that too often exist around children who wait longest to be adopted'

Roe v Wade: men benefit from abortion rights too – and should speak about them more
Abortion rights

Roe v Wade: men benefit from abortion rights too – and should speak about them more

The government is trying to keep us sweet with its 'right to buy' scheme for benefits claimants
Opinion

The government is trying to keep us sweet with its 'right to buy' scheme for benefits claimants

Most Popular

Read All
Exclusive: BT call centre sets up 'food bank' for its own staff
1.

Exclusive: BT call centre sets up 'food bank' for its own staff

Prince William: 'Why I wanted to work with The Big Issue'
2.

Prince William: 'Why I wanted to work with The Big Issue'

Rainn Wilson emailed Star Trek: Strange New Worlds to say Harry Mudd would 'fit right in'
3.

Rainn Wilson emailed Star Trek: Strange New Worlds to say Harry Mudd would 'fit right in'

The UK approach to replacing the Human Rights Act is just as worrying as the replacement itself
4.

The UK approach to replacing the Human Rights Act is just as worrying as the replacement itself

Keep up to date with The Big Issue. The leading voice on life, politics, culture and social activism direct to your inbox.